In Scotland, the financial settlement upon divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership is governed by the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985. Sections 9 and 11 of this Act are key to understanding how assets are divided and what financial support may be provided when a marriage or civil partnership ends. These sections work together to ensure fairness (often aiming for a clean break so both parties can move on independently while protecting those who may be economically vulnerable). Below, we explain each section in plain English and show how they interact in practice.

Section 9: Guiding Principles of Fairness

Section 9 sets out five fundamental principles that Scottish courts must apply when deciding financial provision in a divorce or dissolution. In simple terms, these principles are:

• Fair Sharing of Matrimonial Property: The net value of all matrimonial property (generally, assets acquired during the marriage/civil partnership) should be shared “fairly” between the parties. In most cases, “fairly” means equally, unless there are special circumstances justifying a different split.
• Economic Advantage & Disadvantage: The court will take fair account of any economic advantage one spouse/partner gained from the contributions of the other, and any economic disadvantage suffered by either in the interests of the other or the family. In plain terms, if one person built up career or wealth with the other’s support (for example, one parent gave up career opportunities to raise children), the law recognizes this. Non-financial contributions (like homemaking or childcare) count too, and the aim is to balance out benefits and sacrifices made by each party.
• Fair Sharing of Childcare Burden: If the couple have children under 16, any economic burden of caring for those children after divorce should be shared fairly. Essentially, the costs and financial responsibilities of raising the children should not fall unduly on one parent – both should contribute in proportionate and fair ways.
• Short-Term Financial Support for Adjustment: If one party has been financially dependent on the other to a substantial degree, that person should receive reasonable support for a limited time after divorce/dissolution to adjust to the loss of that financial support. In Scotland this usually takes the form of a periodical allowance (maintenance) for up to three years at most, to help the dependent spouse/partner get back on their feet. The idea is to ease the transition to independent living, rather than create a lifelong obligation.
• Protection from Serious Financial Hardship: If a person is likely to suffer serious financial hardship because of the divorce/dissolution, the court can award financial provision to relieve that hardship. This acts as a safety net – for example, if one spouse would be left destitute or unable to maintain a reasonable standard of living, the settlement can include extra support or a larger share of assets to prevent severe hardship.

These five principles in Section 9 are the starting point for any financial award. Every court order for financial provision should be justified by one or more of these principles and should be reasonable in light of the parties’ resources. In practice, principle (a) (fair sharing of property) is often the primary consideration, with principles (b) through (e) providing adjustments or additional support where simply dividing property equally would not achieve a fair outcome.

Section 11: Factors the Court Considers in Applying the Principles

Section 11 addresses additional factors the court must weigh, particularly for the principles beyond simple asset-sharing. Essentially, Section 11 provides guidance on how to apply the Section 9 principles in practice, ensuring that any financial awards are made with a full understanding of the parties’ circumstances. Key points include:

• For Child-Care Costs (Principle 9(1)(c)): When the court is making an order related to the economic burden of caring for a child under 16, Section 11 says the court shall have regard to a list of factors about the child’s and parents’ situation. In plain terms, to decide how to fairly share ongoing costs for children, the court will consider:
  • any child support/aliment arrangements already in place for the child,any extra expenses or loss of income one parent incurs by looking after the child (for example, if a parent can only work part-time due to childcare),the need for suitable housing for the child (ensuring the child has a home with each parent),the age and health of the child, as well as their educational and financial needs, and general circumstances,the availability and cost of child-care facilities (like day care) to help the parent work,and, importantly, the needs and resources of both parents and all other circumstances of the case.
  In short, the court does a holistic assessment of both the child’s needs and each parent’s ability to meet those needs. The goal is to ensure that the costs of raising the child post-divorce are allocated fairly, without impoverishing one parent or neglecting the child’s welfare.
• For Short-Term Spousal Support (Principle 9(1)(d)): If one spouse is seeking a periodical allowance (maintenance) for a short period after divorce to adjust to independent life, Section 11 again specifies factors the court must consider before awarding such support. These include:
  • the age, health, and earning capacity of the spouse who would receive the support,how long and how heavily that spouse was financially dependent on the other during the marriage,whether that spouse is likely to undergo training or education to improve their employment prospects (for example, plans to retrain or go back to school),the needs and resources of both parties (how much each of them requires to live on, and what means they have),and any other relevant circumstances of the case.
  These criteria ensure that an award of maintenance is not automatic – it must fit the facts. For instance, a younger spouse in good health with a strong earning capacity might not need much, if any, support for long, whereas an older spouse who sacrificed career prospects and now has limited earning potential might justifiably receive maintenance for a period of time. Even then, Scottish law typically limits this support to enable adjustment, not to indefinitely continue the marital standard of living. The Act actually encourages a “clean break” approach – ongoing support after divorce is not the norm in Scotland, and the law only permits it when a capital division alone can’t achieve a fair result.
• For Serious Financial Hardship (Principle 9(1)(e)): Section 11 doesn’t list a separate set of factors for hardship explicitly beyond “needs and resources” and “other circumstances,” but it does instruct the court to consider all the same relevant factors when assessing any claim to relieve serious hardship. Essentially, if someone claims they’ll suffer grave financial difficulties after the divorce, the court will look at that person’s needs, what resources both parties have, and every circumstance (including factors like age, health, earning capacity, etc. as applicable) in deciding whether to award additional provision. The emphasis is on preventing a serious inequity where one party would be left in dire straits.
• General Reasonableness and Resources: Finally, Section 11 underlines that any order the court makes must be reasonable having regard to the resources of the parties. The court won’t award something that one party cannot pay or that leaves one side financially ruined. Also, aside from the specific factors above, the court can consider “all the other circumstances of the case” – a broad phrase allowing flexibility to achieve a fair outcome. Notably, however, one thing Scottish courts do not generally consider is marital misconduct (like whose “fault” the breakup was); financial provision is not about blame – it’s about needs and fair sharing. Only in very exceptional cases might conduct affect financial outcomes.

How Sections 9 & 11 Work Together in Practice

In practice, Sections 9 & 11 operate as an integrated roadmap for financial provision on divorce or dissolution:

• Section 9 sets the objectives – the why and what the court should achieve (fair sharing of property, compensation for imbalances, support for kids, transitional support, hardship avoidance). Think of these principles as the guiding rules or pillars of fairness.
• Section 11 provides the context and checks – it guides the court in applying the other principles (b through e) by laying out relevant factors and considerations. This ensures that when the court is deciding on things like a cash payment for economic disadvantage, or a periodical allowance for a dependent ex-spouse, or how to split child-related costs, it does so in a consistent and reasoned way, taking into account all pertinent circumstances rather than arbitrary guesswork. Section 11 basically fleshes out the fairness criteria, so that outcomes are tailored to the specifics of the case.
• A Two-Stage Test: Scottish courts often describe a two-stage process First, the court asks: Is an order justified by one of the Section 9 principles? If yes, then second: Is the proposed order reasonable given the parties’ resources (and the Section 11 factors)? Only if both tests are satisfied will the order be made. This means you cannot get a financial award unless you can point to at least one of the principles in Section 9 as a justification, and even then the award must be calibrated to what’s realistic and just in the circumstances.
• Promoting a Fair and Clean Break: Together, these sections ensure that financial settlements aim for fairness and self-sufficiency. Assets acquired during the relationship are split fairly (usually equally) to give each party a solid start on their own. If one party has been left worse off due to the marriage (for example, by raising children or supporting the other’s career), the settlement can compensate that via an unequal share or a payment. If there are young children, both parents are expected to share the costs of raising them going forward. Ongoing spousal support is only ordered in Scotland as a last resort and for a short duration – the law’s preference is to adjust the capital division to allow a clean financial break, rather than create a long-term dependency. The overall philosophy is that after a reasonable adjustment period, each individual should be empowered to move on financially independent of the other.

---

Conclusion: For clients, the principles in Sections 9 & 11 of the 1985 Act provide transparency and predictability about what a fair financial settlement looks like. In summary, Section 9 tells you the goals (fair sharing, recognition of contributions, protection for children and weaker parties), and Section 11 outlines the fine-tuning factors the court considers to ensure any division or award truly fits the situation. By working together, these sections guide Scottish courts to achieve equitable outcomes on divorce or dissolution – ones that balance both partners’ contributions and needs, and lay the groundwork for both to move forward without undue hardship. This structured approach is what makes Scotland’s system of financial provision distinct, emphasizing fairness, clarity, and a hopeful eye toward each party’s future after separation.

Ready to discuss your case?

Search XK

Search

_{^{Our website articles are not legal advice. We accept no responsibility for use of this information}}.
_{^{For advice on your specific circumstances, contact XK Family Law Solicitors Aberdeen directly}}.